Employee Benefits

Employee reviews hold opportunities that shouldn't be missed
 
Published Wednesday, June 11, 2008

by Daszkal Bolton



"Accentuate the Positive and Eliminate the Negative"

At most companies, annual employee reviews are required. However, even if they are mandatory at some organizations, they may not happen with regularity. In the worst cases, they may not happen at all. The fact is, many business owners and supervisors dislike the process so much that they procrastinate rather than perform regular reviews. But you shouldn't overlook the opportunities that come with providing feedback to employees. After all, some employees may be unaware of their own shortfalls as well as their strengths. By calling attention to both, you can help enhance good habits and work to eliminate the bad.

What's more, the higher up on the chain of command an employee is, the more critical it is that you give them regular, objective evaluations. Your company's profits may depend on it. Here are seven steps to consider in the process:

1. Require self-evaluations. Before the scheduled meeting, ask employees to do a self-evaluation of issues such as timely completion of projects and relationships with colleagues. That will get them involved, as opposed to feeling like the review is being done to them.

Even if employees rate themselves unreasonably high, the exercise forces them to think about how they performed. As part of a self-evaluation, ask employees: What one single change could you make that would have the biggest impact on the quality of your work or your overall job satisfaction?

2. Provide a written assessment. During the evaluation, offer your assessment of the employee's strengths and weaknesses. A written copy should be readily available for the employee to take with him/her at the end of the meeting. Be sure to base your statements on facts that you've gathered ahead of time. The more specific, the better. For example: "In March and again in June, your sales quotas were twenty percent below the average for our company." Or, "In the last six months, I've received four commendations from customers noting how friendly and efficient you are in handling claims."

Be careful about bringing up a weakness for the first time during an annual review. If you spot a problem months before, but never discuss it with the employee, he or she may feel blindsided if the first mention is in the evaluation. Pointing out issues as they arise gives employees the chance to correct them. Then, during annual reviews, you can either commend the employee for making progress or discuss how the situation still needs to improve.

3. Resolve discrepancies. Resolve differences between your evaluation and the employee's self-evaluation. It's possible that one side has some of the facts wrong or that there are other factors influencing one or the other's ratings.

Example: Your clerk thinks he has a perfect record for accuracy during the last two quarters because, unlike previous quarters, he received no corrections from his manager. But the manager of the department told you that the clerk didn't care about the errors and that it was quicker and easier to fix them than send them back to the clerk to correct. In this case, the clerk and the manager both need to be confronted.

4. Pay attention to the details. Try not schedule more than one employee evaluation in a single day. You won't be able to give each person the attention and concentration necessary to have an effective and productive meeting. Leave yourself enough time after each review to prepare written notes of the conversations while the details are still fresh in your mind.

And make sure to look at the entire past year's performance. It is easy to simply focus on the last couple of weeks or months, but that can lead to employees making noticeable improvements right before annual reviews are conducted or evaluators overlooking major accomplishments that occurred 6-9 months prior to the review.

5. Agree on future goals. Don't assume that you know your employee's career goals or that he or she knows what your ideas for his or her advancement are - discuss them. Determine a plan of action to help the employee attain those goals. If the employee expresses a desire to move to a higher position, discuss how he or she can meet the qualifications. Make the goals as specific as possible, including establishing training needs, specific timelines and benchmarks as appropriate.

6. Be a coach as well as an evaluator. Effective evaluators don't just look at an employee's past behavior. Instead, they act as an employee's coach to come up with goals for the upcoming year that 1) are in sync with the organization; 2) challenge the individual's skills and talents; and 3) can realistically be achieved. Avoid pushing him or her in a direction that is not congruent with his or her stated career goals or setting the bar so high that no one would be able to reach it.

7. Wait until after the review to discuss compensation. Compensation decisions should not be summarily made prior to evaluations and then discussed during the reviews. As stated above, certain things may come to light during the review that you were not anticipating. While you may have an idea in your mind, allow the review process to help clarify what is fair and reasonable for each individual based on his/her merits, progress, benchmarks, skills, etc. Remember - reviews may also be highly emotional - they are not the best time to discuss salaries and bonuses. Wait until after the review has been completed and then schedule a separate, but quick, meeting to discuss compensation. It is important to avoid emailing compensation questions or comments to ensure confidentiality; a five-minute face-to-face meeting is much more appropriate for a variety of reasons.

But what about reviewing top-level executives?

One way many business owners choose to evaluate their executives and top managers -- or even their own performance -- is by using a 360-degree approach. 360-degree feedback produces a more complete picture of an employee's performance than if he or she were just reviewed by supervisors. It can include internal and external feedback. Internal comments can be solicited from management, subordinates, colleagues, and people from other departments. External comments can come from clients, suppliers or outside consultants.

Getting 360-degree feedback is often important because profits can erode when leaders are not effective. Numerous studies have shown that the Number One reason people quit their jobs is because of what they call a "bad boss."

Here are some considerations when using a 360-degree approach:

  • Look at it as a tool for development and communicate that philosophy to everyone involved. Of course, you want honest opinions, but participants need to know the goal is to make the best use of an executive by providing constructive feedback.
  • Take pains to ensure anonymity. Some people will not say what they really think because they fear retribution. To alleviate such fears, it may help to use an outside facilitator, such as a human resources professional or an online company specializing in confidential surveys.
  • No matter who conducts the evaluations, confidentiality must be assured. In one case in Virginia, an employee sued her employer after being fired. A short time earlier, she had participated in a written evaluation of her boss, who obtained the results from an outside consultant. The former employee was awarded $3.5 million in punitive and compensatory damages, but on appeal, the state Supreme Court remanded the case for a new trial. Despite the pending outcome, the case serves as a warning to employers to ensure that confidential evaluations remain confidential.
  • Keep questionnaires short and simple. But give respondents a way to provide more feedback if they choose (i.e., include an optional free-response section at the end so that additional comments may be made if desired).
  • To ensure fairness, disregard super-negative responses that are only given once on any given question.

Don't miss out on opportunities to develop future leaders
Yes, employee reviews can be time consuming and distracting. But if you never tell employees that they aren't performing up to the company's expectations, they may assume that you are satisfied with mediocrity or less. More importantly, without proper communication, you could lose your top achievers and most valuable employees. If you don't take the time to point out their exceptional performance records or discuss the company's future plans and how they fit into them, your excellent employees may conclude that their efforts are unappreciated or that there is no potential for growth at the organization and begin to search for work elsewhere.

Whenever possible, look at employee annual reviews as an opportunity to "accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative." Your bottom line will reflect your efforts over time.


Send this page to a friend

(C) Copyright Daszkal Bolton LLP (2008). All Rights Reserved.

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the United States Treasury Department, you are hereby informed that any advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This advice may not be forwarded without our express written consent. For more information about the Circular 230 disclosure, please click here.